The Polarizing Reception of Plevako: Art vs History
"Plevako" and the Domestic Cinematography: Why the Criticism and Praise Diverge
The Russian series "Plevako" has sparked a whirlwind of reactions among viewers, dividing opinions sharply down the middle. On one side, there are those who lambast the production quality, acting performances, and historical accuracy; on the other, a group that admires the artistic choices and the creativity of the production team. Let’s delve into the key elements that have ignited heated debates.
Bezrukov in the Lead Role: Familiar Face or Just Cliché?
One of the hottest topics of discussion has been Sergey Bezrukov, who plays the titular character. A number of viewers have indicated that his presence alone sets a particular tone for the series. Comments like “Bezrukov in the credits? Time to switch off!” symbolize a palpable fatigue that the audience feels from his frequent appearances in popular Russian productions.
Nevertheless, there’s a silver lining even in the cries of discontent. For instance, a viewer from Cherepovets, Vyacheslav, praised Bezrukov’s performance, stating, “Good film. Bezrukov is magnificent!” This duality in response underscores the complexity of audience expectations.
Historical Authenticity: How Important is Realism?
A significant portion of the criticism directed at "Plevako" hinges on its failure to align closely with historical facts. A particularly shocking scene involving the protagonist engaging in a pagan ritual to incinerate his mother left even the most forgiving viewers reeling. Vyacheslav’s comment succinctly captures the sentiment: “The series doesn't captivate at all. Bezrukov mumbles through his lines; it’s like mush in his mouth.”
Nonetheless, there are those who advocate for creative license in storytelling. Nikolai chimed in with a more relaxed view, suggesting, “If you want veracity, Wikipedia is crying for you!” He encourages audiences to treat the series as mere entertainment rather than a documentary.
Comparisons with Western Projects
Frequent comparisons arise between "Plevako" and its Western counterparts. Some spectators feel that it aspires to mimic the style of Guy Ritchie’s films. One viewer sarcastically noted, “I’m glad to see our creatives finally took a peek at Ritchie’s 'Sherlock Holmes.'” However, another audience member countered that such imitation isn’t always justified, stating, “‘Gangs of New York’ is a good film, but tough to call it historical. Why not carve our own path?”
Costumes, Direction, and Script: The Project's Strong Points
Despite all the criticism, it’s impossible to overlook the positive aspects of the series. Tatiana applauded, “I stand and clap for the director, the scriptwriters, the actors, and the costume designers.” She feels the project effectively blends drama, action, and elements of historical narrative, painting a picture that captivates on numerous fronts.
The Character of Plevako: Charisma or Just Manipulation?
The portrayal of lawyer Fyodor Plevako itself has stirred controversy. Evgeny described him as a “hyped-up empty suit and a manipulator,” criticizing his emotional appeals to the jury over the use of hard facts. In opposition, seasoned lawyers like Eduard K. disagreed, asserting, “He acted within the constraints he faced. If emotional tactics worked back then, why not utilize them?”
Epilogue: To Watch or Not to Watch?
The series "Plevako" is one that has stirred a significant wave of discussions, spurred by its ambiguous artistic and historical choices. For those searching for light entertainment, it might prove to be an intriguing option. However, viewers expecting an immersive dive into historical realities may find themselves underwhelmed. As one discerning commentator aptly put it: “If you just want to kick back and enjoy a series without much thought, this one will do just fine.”
Question for Viewers
What are your thoughts on the blend of artistic fiction and historical events in television series? We’d love to hear your opinions!